Implicit Bias in Clinical Practice: A Guide for Mental Health Providers

Implicit bias refers to the unconscious attitudes, assumptions, and associations that shape how we understand and respond to other people. These biases often develop through culture, family messages, media, education, professional training, personal experiences, and repeated exposure to stereotypes. They can influence us even when we genuinely value fairness, inclusion, and ethical care.

In clinical practice, implicit bias can show up in small but meaningful ways. A provider might interpret the same behavior differently depending on a client’s race, gender, age, disability, body size, diagnosis, language, or socioeconomic status. For example, one client’s anger may be seen as a trauma response, while another client’s anger is labeled as aggression. One parent may be viewed as overwhelmed, while another is described as noncompliant. Same room, same behavior, different story.

That’s what makes implicit bias so important for mental health providers to examine. It doesn’t always feel like bias in the moment. Often, it feels like instinct, clinical judgment, or “just a gut feeling.” But gut feelings are shaped by experience, and experience is shaped by the world we live in. Without reflection, those quick judgments can affect assessment, diagnosis, treatment planning, documentation, referrals, and the therapeutic relationship.

Common forms of implicit bias in clinical settings may include assumptions related to:

Race and ethnicity
Gender identity and sexual orientation
Disability and neurodivergence
Body size and physical appearance
Religion and culture
Language and immigration status
Poverty, education, and social class
Substance use history or diagnosis

Implicit bias doesn’t mean a clinician is intentionally harmful. It means the clinician is human and practicing within systems that have taught all of us certain shortcuts. The ethical responsibility is to notice those shortcuts, question them, and slow down enough to make more thoughtful clinical decisions. In other words, the goal isn’t perfection. The goal is accountability, curiosity, and care that gives every client the chance to be understood more fully.

Learn more about Agents of Change Continuing Education. We’ve helped hundreds of thousands of Social Workers, Counselors, and Mental Health Professionals with their online continuing education and CEUs, and we want you to be next!

2) Implicit Bias in Clinical Practice: A Guide for Mental Health Providers

Implicit bias in clinical practice can be hard to spot because it often hides inside routine decisions. It may show up in the first few minutes of an intake, in the wording of a progress note, in a diagnosis that feels “obvious,” or in a provider’s quick emotional reaction to a client’s behavior. For mental health providers, the goal isn’t to pretend bias can be erased completely. The goal is to build enough self-awareness, structure, humility, and accountability that bias has less room to quietly shape care.

Clinical work requires judgment. That’s part of the job. But judgment becomes risky when it moves faster than curiosity. When a provider assumes they already understand a client’s motivation, family culture, emotional expression, or level of risk, the clinical picture can become distorted. Slowing down gives providers a better chance to see the person in front of them instead of relying on a familiar story.

Why Bias Shows Up in Clinical Work

Mental health providers are trained to observe patterns. We look for symptoms, relational themes, coping strategies, developmental history, trauma responses, risk factors, and diagnostic clues. Pattern recognition can be useful, but it can also become a shortcut.

Bias may show up when providers rely too quickly on assumptions related to:

Race, ethnicity, or culture
Gender identity or sexual orientation
Disability, neurodivergence, or communication style
Body size, appearance, or hygiene
Religion, spirituality, or family values
Income, education, housing, or employment
Parenting style or family structure
Diagnosis, substance use history, or legal involvement

For example, a client who misses appointments may be labeled as “unmotivated” when transportation, childcare, work schedules, depression, executive functioning challenges, or past negative experiences with providers may be part of the picture. A teen who appears disengaged may be seen as resistant when they’re actually anxious, overstimulated, depressed, guarded, or unsure whether the therapist is safe.

Bias narrows the story. Good clinical practice widens it.

Bias in Assessment and Intake

The intake session is one of the most common places for implicit bias to appear. Providers are gathering a lot of information quickly, and because there’s pressure to identify presenting concerns, assess risk, and determine a diagnosis, the clinician’s brain may start filling in blanks too soon.

During assessment, implicit bias can influence:

Which questions the provider asks
Which details the provider follows up on
Which symptoms are treated as clinically significant
Which behaviors are framed as concerning
Which strengths are noticed or overlooked
How much context is considered before forming an impression

A culturally responsive intake makes room for the client’s full context. Instead of focusing only on symptoms, the provider also considers identity, community, environment, systems involvement, discrimination, family meaning-making, and previous experiences with care.

Helpful intake questions may include:

“How do you understand what’s been happening?”
“Are there cultural, family, spiritual, or community factors that feel important here?”
“Have you had experiences with providers that make therapy feel easier or harder?”
“Are there parts of your identity that you want me to understand as we work together?”
“What would respectful support look like to you?”

These questions do more than gather information. They communicate that the client is the expert on their own lived experience.

Bias in Diagnosis

Diagnosis can be one of the most powerful areas where implicit bias affects care. A diagnosis may guide treatment, insurance coverage, medication referrals, school accommodations, disability supports, and how future providers understand the client. Because of that, clinicians need to be careful about how they move from observation to interpretation.

The same behavior can be interpreted in very different ways depending on the client. Anger might be seen as trauma, aggression, mood instability, defiance, grief, advocacy, panic, or sensory overwhelm. Silence might be interpreted as resistance, depression, cultural communication style, fear, dissociation, mistrust, or processing time.

Before assigning a diagnosis, providers can ask themselves:

What evidence supports this diagnosis?
What evidence does not fit?
What else could explain these symptoms?
Have I considered trauma, culture, disability, grief, stress, discrimination, and environment?
Am I relying on a stereotype, even subtly?
Would I conceptualize this differently if the client had a different identity?
Have I consulted when the diagnosis feels complex or high-stakes?

Diagnosis should emerge from careful clinical reasoning, not from a provider’s quickest impression.

Bias in Risk Assessment

Risk assessment requires urgency, but urgency can make bias stronger. When providers feel anxious, uncertain, or responsible for safety decisions, they may lean more heavily on assumptions. This can lead to overestimating risk for some clients and underestimating it for others.

Implicit bias may affect how a clinician interprets:

Anger or emotional intensity
Flat affect or limited eye contact
Guardedness or mistrust
Substance use
Parenting stress
Previous hospitalization
Involvement with legal, school, medical, or child welfare systems

A biased risk assessment can cause real harm. Some clients may be unnecessarily hospitalized, reported, discharged, or treated as dangerous. Others may have serious risk minimized because they appear composed, articulate, successful, or “low concern.”

To reduce bias, providers should use consistent risk assessment practices across clients. Structured questions, consultation, clear documentation, and careful attention to protective factors can help providers make more grounded decisions.

A bias-aware risk assessment includes:

Direct questions about suicidal ideation, self-harm, harm to others, and safety
Exploration of context and triggers
Attention to client strengths and protective factors
Consideration of trauma and systems history
Consultation when clinical reactions feel unusually strong
Documentation that separates facts from interpretation

Bias in the Therapeutic Relationship

Clients often sense bias through small relational cues. They may notice when a provider sounds skeptical, rushes past identity-based stressors, avoids naming race or culture, over-explains basic concepts, or seems surprised by the client’s insight, education, parenting, or resilience.

Bias can affect the therapeutic relationship when providers:

Assume what a client values
Minimize experiences of discrimination
Avoid conversations about identity because they feel uncomfortable
Over-identify with clients who seem familiar
Underestimate clients who communicate differently
Treat distrust as pathology instead of possible wisdom
Expect clients to educate them about oppression or culture

Repair is essential. Even thoughtful providers will miss things. What matters is whether the clinician can notice, listen, apologize when needed, and change course.

A repair might sound like:

“I think I made an assumption there, and I’m sorry.”
“I want to slow down because I may have missed something important.”
“Thank you for telling me. I want to understand how that landed for you.”
“I realize I moved past that too quickly.”
“I’m going to reflect on this and make sure I’m practicing differently moving forward.”

Repair helps rebuild trust because it shows the client that their experience matters more than the clinician’s comfort.

Bias in Documentation

Clinical documentation is another place where implicit bias can become embedded. Notes may seem routine, but they can follow clients across systems and influence future care. A note can either describe behavior with context or reduce a client to a negative label.

For example:

Instead of “Client was noncompliant,” write “Client reported difficulty completing the plan due to transportation barriers and uncertainty about next steps.”
Instead of “Parent was hostile,” write “Parent appeared frustrated and raised concerns about feeling dismissed by previous providers.”
Instead of “Client refused to participate,” write “Client was quiet and declined several questions. Clinician explored whether pacing, trust, or topic sensitivity contributed.”
Instead of “Teen is attention-seeking,” write “Teen used intense language to communicate distress and a desire for support.”

The goal is not to soften every clinical concern. The goal is to be accurate, contextual, and respectful. Documentation should describe what happened without turning behavior into character judgment.

Bias in Treatment Planning

Treatment planning can reveal what providers believe is possible for a client. Bias may lead clinicians to set goals that are too narrow, too culturally mismatched, too compliance-based, or too disconnected from the client’s lived reality.

A treatment plan may be biased if it:

Assumes independence is always the best goal
Ignores family, community, or cultural values
Focuses on compliance instead of collaboration
Overlooks barriers like transportation, cost, childcare, disability, or work schedules
Frames the client as the problem while ignoring environmental stress
Uses interventions that don’t fit the client’s communication style or learning needs

Strong treatment planning is collaborative. It asks what the client wants, what has already been tried, what barriers exist, what supports are available, and what change would actually feel meaningful.

Useful treatment planning questions include:

“What would feel different if therapy were helping?”
“What goals feel realistic right now?”
“What has worked for you before?”
“What gets in the way of follow-through?”
“Who or what supports you outside this room?”
“Are there parts of this plan that don’t fit your life?”

How Providers Can Interrupt Bias in the Moment

Bias interruption is a clinical skill. It doesn’t require perfection. It requires a pause.

When a quick judgment appears, providers can slow down by asking:

What am I assuming?
What facts do I actually have?
What else could explain this?
What context might I be missing?
How might power, culture, trauma, or systems be shaping this moment?
Have I asked the client directly?
Do I need consultation?
How can I document this more neutrally?

Sometimes, the most ethical thing a provider can do is pause before deciding what something means.

Building a Bias-Aware Clinical Practice

Reducing the impact of implicit bias takes ongoing practice. It’s not a one-time training or a single reflective exercise. It becomes part of how providers assess, diagnose, document, consult, and repair.

Mental health providers can strengthen bias-aware practice by:

Seeking regular supervision or consultation
Reviewing documentation for loaded language
Using structured tools for assessment and risk
Asking clients for feedback
Engaging in continuing education on cultural humility and ethics
Tracking patterns across diagnosis, referrals, and discharge decisions
Learning from communities without making individual clients responsible for teaching everything
Staying open to correction without becoming defensive

At its core, bias-aware care is about humility. It asks clinicians to accept that they may miss things, misread things, and need to change things. That honesty isn’t a weakness. It’s part of ethical, human-centered care.

When mental health providers take implicit bias seriously, the therapy room becomes more spacious. Clients have more room to be complex. Providers have more room to be curious. And clinical care has a better chance of being accurate, respectful, and genuinely responsive.

Agents of Change has helped hundreds of thousands of Social Workers, Counselors, and Mental Health Professionals with Continuing Education, learn more here about Agents of Change and claim your 7.5 free CEUs!

3) Practical Strategies to Reduce Implicit Bias

Reducing implicit bias in clinical practice takes more than good intentions. It requires repeatable habits that help providers slow down, question assumptions, and make more thoughtful clinical decisions. The goal isn’t to become perfectly unbiased, because that’s not realistic. The goal is to notice bias sooner, interrupt it more often, and repair more honestly when it affects care.

1. Slow Down Your First Interpretation

Implicit bias often moves quickly. A client misses two sessions, and the provider thinks, “They’re not invested.” A parent sounds frustrated, and the provider thinks, “They’re difficult.” A teen avoids eye contact, and the provider thinks, “They’re hiding something.” Maybe those interpretations are partly true, but maybe they’re not.

To implement this strategy, build a pause into your clinical thinking. Before writing a note, making a diagnosis, or deciding on a treatment direction, ask yourself:

What did I actually observe?
What am I assuming?
What else could explain this behavior?
What context have I not explored yet?
Would I interpret this the same way with a different client?

This pause doesn’t need to be dramatic. Even thirty seconds of reflection can help separate clinical data from personal assumptions. Over time, this becomes a habit of curiosity rather than an instant conclusion.

2. Use Structured Tools and Consistent Questions

Bias has more room to operate when clinical decisions are vague or inconsistent. Structured tools can help providers ask similar questions across clients, especially during intake, diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment planning. This doesn’t mean therapy becomes robotic. It means the provider is less likely to skip important questions based on assumptions.

To implement this strategy, create a consistent set of questions or checklists for high-impact clinical moments. For example, during assessment, ask every client about safety, trauma, culture, identity, support systems, access barriers, and past experiences with providers. During risk assessment, use a structured protocol while still making space for the client’s story.

Helpful questions may include:

“Are there cultural, family, spiritual, or community factors that feel important for me to understand?”
“Have you ever felt misunderstood or dismissed by a provider?”
“What barriers might make follow-through difficult?”
“What does support look like in your life?”
“Are there parts of your identity that affect how you experience stress or care?”

Consistency helps protect against selective curiosity, where some clients get deeper exploration and others get quicker assumptions.

3. Review Your Documentation for Loaded Language

Clinical notes can quietly carry bias. Words like “noncompliant,” “manipulative,” “aggressive,” “resistant,” or “attention-seeking” may sometimes reflect provider frustration more than clinical precision. Documentation should describe behavior clearly, but it should also include context.

To implement this strategy, review your notes once a week and look for language that turns behavior into character judgment. Then revise toward observable, neutral, and contextual wording.

For example:

Instead of “Client was noncompliant,” write “Client reported difficulty following the plan due to transportation barriers and confusion about next steps.”
Instead of “Parent was hostile,” write “Parent appeared frustrated and expressed concern about feeling dismissed by previous providers.”
Instead of “Teen refused to engage,” write “Teen gave brief responses and appeared hesitant to discuss the topic. Clinician explored pacing and trust.”

This shift doesn’t water down clinical concerns. It makes documentation more accurate, respectful, and useful.

4. Seek Consultation That Challenges Your Assumptions

Consultation is one of the strongest tools for reducing the impact of implicit bias, but only when it goes beyond case logistics. Strong consultation helps providers examine emotional reactions, cultural context, power dynamics, and possible blind spots.

To implement this strategy, bring specific bias-aware questions into supervision or peer consultation. Instead of only asking, “What intervention should I use?” try asking:

“What assumptions might I be making about this client?”
“Am I over-focusing on risk or under-focusing on context?”
“Could culture, trauma, disability, or systems involvement change how we understand this?”
“Is my documentation describing behavior or judging the person?”
“What am I feeling toward this client, and how might that affect care?”

It also helps to seek consultation from providers with different identities, training backgrounds, and clinical lenses. If everyone in the room sees the case the same way, blind spots may stay hidden.

5. Ask for Client Feedback and Practice Repair

Clients often notice when something feels off before clinicians do. They may sense that a provider misunderstood them, minimized something important, or made an assumption. Creating space for feedback gives clients permission to name those moments before trust erodes.

To implement this strategy, ask simple feedback questions regularly, especially after sensitive conversations.

Try questions like:

“Did I understand that the way you meant it?”
“Was there anything I missed today?”
“Did anything I said feel inaccurate or unhelpful?”
“Are we focusing on what matters most to you?”
“Is there anything I should understand better about your experience?”

When a client gives feedback, resist the urge to explain yourself right away. Start with listening. A repair might sound like, “Thank you for telling me. I can see how that landed differently than I intended, and I want to slow down and understand better.”

Repair is not a sign of failure. It’s a clinical skill. When providers can acknowledge missteps without defensiveness, they model accountability and help rebuild safety in the therapeutic relationship.

4) Continuing Education on Implicit Bias as an Ethical Practice

Continuing education on implicit bias should be viewed as more than a licensing requirement. For mental health providers, it’s part of ethical practice. Therapists, social workers, counselors, and other clinicians make decisions every day that affect how clients are assessed, diagnosed, documented, referred, and treated. Because implicit bias can shape those decisions quietly, ongoing learning helps providers stay reflective, accountable, and clinically responsive.

Implicit bias work isn’t something a provider finishes after one training. It requires repeated exposure to new perspectives, opportunities for self-reflection, and practical tools that can be brought back into the therapy room. A clinician may understand the concept of bias intellectually, but continuing education can help translate that awareness into better questions, more thoughtful documentation, stronger supervision conversations, and more culturally responsive treatment planning.

Why Continuing Education Matters

Clinical practice changes over time. Language evolves, ethical expectations shift, research expands, and clients bring lived experiences that may challenge what providers were originally taught. Continuing education helps clinicians stay open and current instead of relying only on old frameworks or personal instinct.

Continuing education on implicit bias can help providers:

Recognize how unconscious assumptions affect clinical judgment
Explore the relationship between bias, ethics, and client harm
Improve culturally responsive assessment and diagnosis
Strengthen documentation practices
Build more effective repair skills when mistakes happen
Understand how power, privilege, systems, and identity shape care
Practice with more humility and accountability

When providers continue learning, they communicate something important: clients deserve care that keeps growing.

Recommended Courses for Mental Health Providers

The following courses from Agents of Change Continuing Education are great options for providers who want to deepen their understanding of implicit bias, multicultural practice, ethics, leadership, and culturally responsive care:

Implicit Bias and Peer Support
https://agentsofchangeprep.com/continuing-education/course-detail/implicit-bias-peer-support
This course is a strong fit for providers who want to better understand how implicit bias can affect helping relationships, peer support, and the way professionals interpret client behavior and lived experience.
Ethical Challenges of Conversational AI
https://agentsofchangeprep.com/continuing-education/course-detail/ethical-challenges-of-conversational-ai
As technology becomes more common in mental health spaces, clinicians need to think carefully about bias, privacy, ethics, access, and the use of AI tools in clinical and professional decision-making.
Multicultural Issues in the Therapy Room
https://agentsofchangeprep.com/continuing-education/course-detail/multicultural-issues-therapy-room
This course can help providers reflect on culture, identity, power, and the clinical relationship. It’s especially relevant for clinicians who want to create therapy spaces where clients feel seen, respected, and understood.
Culturally Responsive Leadership
https://agentsofchangeprep.com/continuing-education/course-detail/culturally-responsive-leadership-recorded/
For supervisors, practice owners, administrators, educators, and team leads, this course supports a broader view of bias. It looks beyond individual provider behavior and invites reflection on leadership, organizational culture, and equity-informed systems.
Cultural Intelligence in the Workplace
https://agentsofchangeprep.com/continuing-education/course-detail/cultural-Intelligence-workplace
This course is useful for providers working in agencies, group practices, schools, hospitals, and interdisciplinary teams. Cultural intelligence can improve communication, collaboration, supervision, and client care.

Making Continuing Education Practical

The most useful continuing education doesn’t stay in a notebook. It changes what happens in the next session, the next intake, the next progress note, and the next consultation meeting. After completing a course on implicit bias or cultural responsiveness, providers can turn learning into practice by choosing one or two concrete actions.

For example, a clinician might:

Add identity and culture questions to their intake process
Review progress notes for judgmental or loaded language
Bring one bias-related reflection question to supervision each week
Ask clients for feedback more consistently
Revisit diagnostic patterns across their caseload
Create a repair script for moments when assumptions cause harm
Build a more diverse consultation and learning network

Small changes can become powerful when they’re repeated. One course may spark awareness, but implementation turns awareness into ethical care.

Affordable CEUs Through Agents of Change Continuing Education

Agents of Change Continuing Education offers more than 200 ASWB and NBCC-approved courses for therapists, social workers, counselors, and mental health professionals who need continuing education credits to keep their licenses active. The platform also offers more than 20 live continuing education events each year, giving providers regular opportunities to learn in real time and stay engaged with current clinical topics.

For clinicians looking for an affordable option, Agents of Change is one of the most cost-effective CEU choices available. Their $99 per year subscription includes access to a growing library of 200 ASWB and NBCC-approved courses, 20+ live events per year, which is more than one per month, and more. For busy mental health professionals balancing clinical work, documentation, supervision, family life, and licensure requirements, that kind of access can make ongoing ethical learning much easier to sustain.

Continuing Education as Accountability

At its best, continuing education is a form of accountability. It reminds providers that good intentions are not enough, especially when working across differences in race, culture, class, gender, sexuality, disability, religion, language, and lived experience. Ethical care requires ongoing reflection, updated knowledge, and the humility to recognize that every clinician has more to learn.

Implicit bias work asks mental health providers to stay curious about their own assumptions and committed to reducing harm. Continuing education gives clinicians a structured way to keep doing that work with more intention. And when providers keep learning, clients benefit from care that is more thoughtful, more culturally responsive, and more deeply human.

5) FAQs – Implicit Bias in Clinical Practice: A Guide for Mental Health Providers

Q: How does implicit bias affect mental health assessment and diagnosis?

A: Implicit bias can influence what a provider notices, what they asks about, and how they interpret a client’s symptoms or behavior. For example, one client’s guardedness may be understood as trauma-related self-protection, while another client’s guardedness may be labeled as resistance. A child’s emotional outburst may be viewed as anxiety, sensory overload, defiance, or poor parenting, depending on the provider’s assumptions about race, gender, disability, family structure, or socioeconomic status.

This matters because assessment and diagnosis shape treatment plans, referrals, documentation, insurance decisions, school recommendations, and future care. To reduce the impact of bias, mental health providers can use structured assessment tools, ask consistent questions across clients, seek consultation for complex cases, and pause before turning a first impression into a clinical conclusion.

Q: What can mental health providers do when they realize bias may have affected a client interaction?

A: The first step is to slow down and resist the urge to become defensive. Even when harm wasn’t intended, the client’s experience still matters. A provider can reflect on what happened, seek consultation if needed, and return to the client with humility and accountability. A repair might sound like, “I’ve been thinking about what I said last session, and I realize I may have made an assumption. I’m sorry, and I’d like to understand how that landed for you.”

Repair works best when it’s specific, sincere, and followed by changed behavior. Providers can also review their documentation, adjust their clinical questions, and continue learning through supervision, consultation, and continuing education. Bias work isn’t about being perfect. It’s about staying honest, responsive, and willing to repair.

Q: Why is continuing education important for reducing implicit bias in clinical practice?

A: Continuing education helps mental health providers move beyond basic awareness and build practical skills for more ethical, culturally responsive care. Implicit bias is shaped by culture, systems, training, personal history, and repeated exposure to stereotypes, so it takes ongoing learning to interrupt it consistently. Quality CE courses can help providers examine assumptions, improve documentation, strengthen assessment practices, explore multicultural issues, and better understand how identity, power, technology, leadership, and systems affect clinical care.

Continuing education also keeps providers from relying only on what they learned years ago, especially as language, research, ethical standards, and client needs continue to evolve. For therapists, social workers, counselors, and other mental health professionals, learning about implicit bias is not just professional development. It’s part of the responsibility to provide care that is thoughtful, accountable, and grounded in respect for each client’s lived experience.

6) Conclusion

Implicit bias in clinical practice is not a side issue or a one-time training topic. It affects the everyday moments that shape client care, including assessment, diagnosis, documentation, risk evaluation, treatment planning, supervision, and repair. Mental health providers may have strong ethics and compassionate intentions, but good intentions alone don’t prevent unconscious assumptions from influencing clinical judgment.

The work begins when providers are willing to slow down and ask better questions. What am I assuming? What context might I be missing? Would I interpret this differently if the client had a different identity, background, diagnosis, or communication style? These questions create space for humility, curiosity, and more accurate care. Over time, small practices like structured assessments, reflective documentation, consultation, client feedback, and continuing education can help providers reduce harm and build stronger therapeutic relationships.

At its core, addressing implicit bias is about seeing clients more fully. It asks mental health professionals to honor the complexity of each person’s story rather than relying on shortcuts, stereotypes, or familiar clinical narratives. When providers commit to ongoing learning and accountability, the therapy room becomes a more ethical, responsive, and human space for healing.

► Learn more about the Agents of Change Continuing Education here: https://agentsofchangetraining.com

About the Instructor, Dr. Meagan Mitchell: Meagan is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and has been providing Continuing Education for Social Workers, Counselors, and Mental Health Professionals for more than 10 years. From all of this experience helping others, she created Agents of Change Continuing Education to help Social Workers, Counselors, and Mental Health Professionals stay up-to-date on the latest trends, research, and techniques.

#socialwork #socialworker #socialwork #socialworklicense #socialworklicensing #continuinged #continuingeducation #ce #socialworkce #freecesocialwork #lmsw #lcsw #counselor #NBCC #ASWB #ACE

Disclaimer: This content has been made available for informational and educational purposes only. This content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical or clinical advice, diagnosis, or treatment

Note: Certain images used in this post were generated with the help of artificial intelligence.

Implicit Bias in Clinical Practice: A Guide for Mental Health Providers

Implicit Bias in Clinical Practice: A Guide for Mental Health Providers

1) What Is Implicit Bias?